An analysis of human cloning and its effects

At a certain point in time, it was considered as a profound achievement in biology, but this is no longer the case these days, as the number of its opponents are increasing, making such technology quickly becoming a heated topic in debates from all over the world. The technology of cloning humans is already here, as evidenced by Dolly the sheep, but it called forth questions about the role of God in society, the soul and even the quality of life a cloned individual would have.

An analysis of human cloning and its effects

It is no longer a thrilling wisdom of science fiction. The technique is available. The question is whether it would be ethically and socially acceptable including the potential concerns that might be associated with cloning humans.

Dolly, The sheep, was the first mammal to be cloned from a single adult cell, accomplished by Ian Wilmut, Keith H. The experiment was halted at that stage to avoid contravening local ethical guidelines. Concern has been expressed in the editorial of The Lancet that in future some research group will succeed in cloning human [2].

The Worldwide responses to human cloning have been mixed.

An analysis of human cloning and its effects

It has been banned by several countries and declared unacceptable by the Christian, Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist faiths [2].

The scientific community has expressed concern that a broadly worded ban would block basic and applied research using cloning techniques on human cells-research, which has the potential to answer important questions in cell regulation and to make therapeutic advances [1].


Cloning research on human cells has been made legal in the UK. As all other advances in human reproduction, human cloning has raised ethical and moral issues, which possibly would subside with the passage of time as has happened before.A second defense of human cloning on the grounds of freedom is the claim that human existence is by its very nature "open-ended," "indeterminate," and "unpredictable." Human beings are always remaking themselves, their values, and their ways of interacting with one another.

II. The Case against Cloning-to-Produce-Children

To arrive at its recommendations concerning the use of somatic cell nuclear transfer techniques to create children, NBAC also examined long-standing religious traditions that guide many citizens' responses to new technologies and found that religious positions on human cloning are pluralistic in their premises, modes of argument, and conclusions.

In fact, over 90% of human cloning attempts have been labeled as “failure”, which means that the human DNA is only put at risk during the process. As you can see, human DNA can be contaminated, and the chances of success are very rare.

[hereinafter CLONING HUMAN BEINGS]. 2. See id.

PCBE: Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry -- Full Report

Human Cloning Research] (testimony of Hessel Bouma Ill, Professor of Biology at Calvin College Should we ignore the deleterious effects of cloning on a child in the ] CASE AGAINST HUMAN CLONING.

CASE AGAINST HUMAN CLONING Ehlers: The Case Against Human Cloning. Dec 03,  · Imagine if you, as a current college student, were a cloned human. And imagine people criticizing how human cloning is unethical or “plays God.” It would just make you feel like your whole life and existence is a crime against humanity.

Cloning: A Review on Bioethics, Legal, Jurisprudence and Regenerative Issues in Iran

Human Cloning: the Negative Effects on Society. Human Cloning: The Negative Effects on Society Human cloning is possible but also dangerous to society.

An analysis of human cloning and its effects

One day during an assembly in March , a heated debate began over the topic of human sides were getting very .

Human Cloning 3 Case Study Solution and Analysis of Harvard Case Studies